The Proverbot9001 comparison numbers were run using our own infrastructure, not the extracted CoqGym data. As a result, we were only able to run on projects that supported Coq 8.10, 8.11, or 8.12. Unless otherwise noted, projects were run using Coq 8.11.0.
Project | Status |
---|---|
"weak-up-to" | Success |
"buchberger" | Success (git) |
"jordan-curve-theorem" | Success (git, Coq 8.10) |
"dblib" | Success |
"disel" | Success |
"zchinese" | Success (git, "v8.9" branch) |
"zfc" | Success |
"dep-map" | Success |
"chinese" | Success |
"UnifySL" | Success (Coq 8.10.2) |
"hoare-tut" | Success (git) |
"huffman" | Success |
"PolTac" | Success (Coq 8.12.0) |
"angles" | Success |
"coq-procrastination" | Success (git) |
"coq-library-undecidability" | Success |
"tree-automata" | Success (Coq 8.10.1) |
"coquelicot" | Success (updated, skip linearizing theories/SF_seq.v) |
"fermat4" | Success (git,b) |
"demos" | Success |
"coqoban" | Success |
"goedel" | Success (Coq 8.10) |
"verdi-raft" | Success |
"verdi" | Success (git) |
"zorns-lemma" | Success (git) |
"coqrel" | Failed: Coq Anomaly "Uncaught exception Option.IsNone" |
"fundamental-arithmetics" | Success |